• Blockbasis
  • Posts
  • Polter Finance: The $8.7 Million Exploit

Polter Finance: The $8.7 Million Exploit

Polter Finance’s $8.7 Million Exploit: A Lesson in Oracle Vulnerabilities, Unaudited Code, and the Risks of Skipping Security Audits in DeFi Protocols

In partnership with

TL;DR

Polter Finance suffered an $8.7 million loss after an attacker exploited vulnerabilities in their unaudited code and faulty oracle system. The protocol's security oversight, including reliance on manipulated price feeds, allowed the exploit to occur. Despite attempts to trace funds and mitigate damage, the incident underscores the dangers of skipping audits.

Make Sure This Hack Doesn’t Happen To You 🫵

Subscribe to Blockbasis and get access to our premium scanner to check whether your the funds in your wallet is safeguarded from hacks 🔐

For a limited period only, you can get a 7 day FREE trial!

All for just $50/month after the trial.
Don't miss out! Grab your FREE trial today 👇

The recent breach at Polter Finance highlights persistent challenges in the decentralized finance (DeFi) space, where security often takes a back seat to rapid deployment. This time, an unaudited protocol fell victim to a well-known price manipulation exploit, resulting in losses of approximately $8.7 million.

Polter’s newly launched BOO market was exploited by an attacker who leveraged spot price dependencies to drain funds.

The team’s response involved filing a police report, estimating damages at $12 million - a figure that some suspect may be overstated. Meanwhile, the protocol’s total value locked (TVL) continued to plummet, reflecting the impact of a predictable oracle vulnerability.

As is often the case in such incidents, the aftermath unfolded in a familiar pattern: platform operations were paused, bridges were locked, Binance wallets were traced, and the team attempted to negotiate with the attacker, appealing to return funds.

The reliance on unaudited code once again proved costly, serving as a reminder that replicating code does not replicate security measures.

Let’s dive deeper…

The BOO market exploit at Polter Finance highlights critical vulnerabilities in DeFi operations.

The first sign of trouble came when user BcPaintball reported suspicious activity within Polter’s newly launched BOO market.

However, the team delayed acknowledging the issue for roughly seven hours, a significant gap during which the exploit progressed.

Nick Franklin’s post-mortem analysis identified the root cause as a classic case of oracle manipulation. The attacker exploited weaknesses in the system’s reliance on spot prices, turning them into easy targets.

Meanwhile, William Li’s initial observations suggested the issue might stem from an “empty market” rounding error. However, further investigation uncovered a more severe problem - a flawed oracle design that made the system highly susceptible to exploitation.

Polter Finance's critical error lay in relying on SpookySwap V2/V3 pool prices to determine the oracle value for their BOO token. This approach proved to be highly insecure, akin to locking a vault with a paper latch.

The attacker executed a flash loan to drain the BOO token reserves, manipulating the price feed to their advantage.

By inflating the token's value artificially, they deposited just one BOO token as collateral and borrowed extensively against the inflated price.

In DeFi, this case serves as a reminder that even basic manipulation tactics can result in costly consequences when critical security measures are overlooked.

The attacker behind Polter Finance’s exploit was identified as wallet address: 0x511f427Cdf0c4e463655856db382E05D79Ac44a6

Utilizing a contract at: 0xA21451aC32372C123191B3a4FC01deB69F91533a.

A detailed flow of funds was tracked on Metasleuth, revealing the extent of the operation.

In the aftermath of the $8.7 million breach, the team filed a police report in Singapore, surprisingly claiming $12 million in losses—an apparent discrepancy that raises questions about their calculations.

The response strategy followed a predictable trajectory: halting operations, tracing funds, and issuing an on-chain plea to the attacker in hopes of recovering the stolen assets.

Following the exploit, Polter Finance swiftly enacted several measures to contain the damage. The platform was paused, bridge operators were notified, and the team claimed to have traced the attacker’s wallet to Binance.

However, blockchain analysis revealed that the stolen funds were already being routed through various pathways, complicating recovery efforts.

In an official statement, the Polter team shared, "Platform paused soon after the exploit was identified. Bridges were notified. We identified wallets involved and traced it to Binance." This was accompanied by a pledge to involve authorities, though it echoed the standard assurances often issued in such scenarios.

To recover the stolen funds, Polter attempted direct communication with the attacker via on-chain messaging. However, many argue that the team's time would have been better spent months earlier ensuring thorough security audits.

By skipping these critical checks in favor of a rapid launch, Polter Finance embraced a high-risk approach. Their reliance on unaudited code proved as overconfident as the inflated prices of their exploited BOO token, ultimately leading to predictable consequences.

Polter Finance's audit page states, "As the smart contract used is identical to Geist, except for the removal of the flash-loan function in Lending Pool, we are providing the Geist audit report here." This approach reflects a concerning reliance on surface-level security assurances, rather than a thorough, independent review.

The outcome serves as a clear example of the risks of skipping proper audits. Polter Finance lost approximately $8.7 million, likely to save only a few weeks and a few thousand dollars on audit expenses.

In DeFi, this short-term cost-cutting decision proved to be far more expensive in the long run.

Instead of investing in professional security assessments, Polter opted for copying existing code without the necessary validation, resulting in predictable vulnerabilities and a significant financial loss.

Polter Finance’s only "audit" came from the exploiter, with results that are far from reassuring.

As cryptocurrency pushes toward mainstream adoption, the industry’s success depends on protocols like Polter addressing critical security flaws. If these issues are left unaddressed, the path to widespread acceptance could lead to severe setbacks.

The industry is already grappling with its growing pains, and without fixing basic security vulnerabilities, the push for mass adoption could derail.

Given Polter Finance’s current trajectory, it’s uncertain whether they will survive in the long term without substantial improvements to their security practices.

Once again, a protocol has shown that simply copying code does not ensure success.

Polter Finance’s $8.7 million loss highlights a fundamental failure in Oracle security, compounded by questionable reporting, such as their $12 million police report, which raises concerns about their accuracy in handling losses.

By skipping audits and using vulnerable oracles, the team exemplified poor DeFi management. Their security approach seemed to rely more on optimism than on rigorous testing, relying on a borrowed audit report rather than creating their own robust security measures.

The exploiter didn’t find an innovative vulnerability; they simply exploited the glaring flaws Polter Finance left unprotected.

As cryptocurrency aims for mainstream adoption, such basic security failures are not only embarrassing but also pose significant risks to the industry.

Polter Finance now joins a long list of protocols that mistook convenience for competence.

The critical question remains: how many more users need to be impacted before protocols recognize that simply copying code is not enough to be prepared for widespread use?

Unlock Windsurf Editor, by Codeium.

Introducing the Windsurf Editor, the first agentic IDE. All the features you know and love from Codeium’s extensions plus new capabilities such as Cascade that act as collaborative AI agents, combining the best of copilot and agent systems. This flow state of working with AI creates a step-change in AI capability that results in truly magical moments.

Daily News for Curious Minds

Be the smartest person in the room by reading 1440! Dive into 1440, where 4 million Americans find their daily, fact-based news fix. We navigate through 100+ sources to deliver a comprehensive roundup from every corner of the internet – politics, global events, business, and culture, all in a quick, 5-minute newsletter. It's completely free and devoid of bias or political influence, ensuring you get the facts straight. Subscribe to 1440 today.